….this one’s for you.
Go tell it like it is, baby – if you dare.
Oh yeah – and answer the questions. Don’t just go off into another one of your boring “radical feminists are just slut shaming prudes and I loves me my porn” pieces. Try and answer the questions, why don’t you? you appreciate a challenge, after all – being the ‘big‘ “men” that you are.
(‘This’ being Nine Deuce in all her glory)
32 responses so far ↓
Maggie Hays // July 28, 2008 at 3:30 am |
I wonder if they will ever answer?
Laurelin // July 28, 2008 at 9:30 am |
I love you, Witchy! xxx
Heart // July 28, 2008 at 6:01 pm |
Nice!
stormy // July 28, 2008 at 6:52 pm |
Thanks for alerting us to her post (and blog).
And on your challenge to the trio, don’t hold your breath. They only have enough attention span to trash radfems.
I always just want to say to them “well, you love your porn so much, go watch some, and leave us the fuck alone”. Not terribly noble of me, I know. I secretly wish they would wank themselves to death. The world would be a better place.
jennifer drew // July 28, 2008 at 11:27 pm |
Oh I think they’ll answer and some have already. One excuse/justification I can see already is how porn, so-called sex positivism can be separated out from the everyday mundane acts of male violence against women. Answer is because porn has no effect whatsoever on cultural views concerning women as a group. Rather like saying ‘well racism is a totally separate issue from misogyny and women-hating.
Anthony Kennerson // July 28, 2008 at 11:48 pm |
You lay it down, Witchy, and I pick it back up.
The SmackDog Chronicles: Answering the Great Male Sex-Positive Challenge from Nine Deuce
Don’t ever say that I don’t answer a challenge, ma’am.
Anthony
Amananta // July 29, 2008 at 2:00 am |
Ha, a few showed up to whine about “feminist censorship” silencing them. Because you know, feminists run the entire internet and the poor widdle menz have no place to express their misogynistic porn-sick desires.
Oh wait.
I particularly liked the one who whines that the world isn’t misogynistic after pointing Nine Deuce to Fark. Um… what?
Gayle // July 29, 2008 at 2:16 am |
Hi Witchy!!
I don’t think the porn-sick boys are going to respond to you. They’d much rather let the girls handle it for them. But good on you for offering up the challenge!
Gayle // July 29, 2008 at 2:17 am |
“I secretly wish they would wank themselves to death. The world would be a better place.”
LOL!
Sis // July 29, 2008 at 6:38 am |
Having now seen what they look like I can understand why they praise on/shine pornography. Pretense is all they’re ever going to get.
witchywoo // July 29, 2008 at 7:10 pm |
Woo look. A Kennerson’s responded
Unfortunately he’s done so at a venue I refuse to visit as opposed to the blog where the questions were actually asked so I’ll never get to read – or respond to – his pearls of wisdom.
Shame.
Laurelin // July 29, 2008 at 7:12 pm |
the ones complaining that they daren’t say anything on radfem blogs because they risk being shouted down are particularly entertaining. now they know how women feel most of the time… except that their worst nightmare is being called a prick on a blog, not sexual violence.
and the chap saying that he can’t comment on radfem blogs because his arguments will appear sefl-serving… hmmm, maybe there’s a reason for that?
Laurelin // July 29, 2008 at 7:21 pm |
ah, but ND has copypasted his pearls of wisdom in the comments thread on her post. Get ready for the bleeding predictable….
witchywoo // July 29, 2008 at 7:26 pm |
Oh excellent. Nice one ND
I shall pop over and take a look when I’ve finished doing my ironing
Nine Deuce // July 29, 2008 at 7:45 pm |
Kennerson accused me of posting a racist comment as a specific attack on him, even though I’d never heard of him until yesterday (and even though I don’t see the comic the way he does). Kind of funny. I’m going to get myself over to my local beer shack with WiFi and get to respondin’.
Nine Deuce // July 29, 2008 at 7:46 pm |
I meant racist comic.
witchywoo // July 29, 2008 at 8:19 pm |
“Kennerson accused me of posting a racist [comic] as a specific attack on him, even though I’d never heard of him until yesterday”
Heh. Classic
Nine Deuce // July 29, 2008 at 10:04 pm |
He also accused me of slut-shaming and wanting to enforce my “conservative” sexuality on people, and he told me I’m not really a feminst. He’s a piece of work. I like that he made a big deal of radfems moderating their sites, but I can’t comment on his.
Laurelin // July 29, 2008 at 10:27 pm |
That’s pretty much standard Kennerson procedure. He is also fond of using phrases like ‘wingnut’, ‘fascist’ etc. to describe us, in order to link us to the right wing in his readers’ minds. No decent evidence is offered up for this of course, and ‘fascist’ is particularly transparent- I’m pretty sure it’s what you say when you know you’ll be called out for using ‘feminazi’. We really have bugger-all to do with either Mussolini or Hitler.
If we used language as emotive and filled with insults as his, we’d be called hysterical and laughed at. The fact he has to keep outright claiming that he respects women while finding (some of) them sexy reveals everything- it’s women who can say whether he respects them or not, not him. Duh. And having seen the verbal abuse he dishes out to women who won’t do as he says, it’s pretty clear he’s a run-of-the-mill misogynist.
Business as usual, in other words.
delphyne // July 29, 2008 at 11:11 pm |
Using porn fucks your head. It turns people into vicious liars who will say anything to protect their habit. Kennerson et al are prime examples of its effects.
I see that freak Soulhuntre is linking to Nine Deuce as well. You’re getting all the goodies over there ND. You can only hope whilst they are hassling women on-line that at least some real life woman is being spared their attentions.
thebewilderness // July 30, 2008 at 3:22 am |
He sounds remarkably like a wingnut, but i shouldn’t be surprised since they have so much in common. Most notably their misogyny.
Arantxa // July 30, 2008 at 8:40 am |
Why anyone would want to engage with these men is beyond me. Seriously, does anyone here think that their abuse of women is just talk? These men sexually abuse women and you want to speak to them? Court their attention, solicit their opinions and respond to them?
womensspace // July 30, 2008 at 1:17 pm |
You’ve given it a good shot, N.D.; really, though, none of these guys is interesting in any sort of intelligent dicussion. You’ve got the haters in your thread en masse and in force. They won’t give your words remotely the attention they deserve, they will jerk you around any way they can. I’m just saying, don’t throw your good energy after bad, after a point it’s just useless because this crowd doesn’t care. I also think some of them are dangerous, people to stay far far away from.
womensspace // July 30, 2008 at 1:32 pm |
Ugh, I just glanced at the latest stuff over at your place ND. You’re being gangpiled there by that same old messed up crowd of people we know so well, people with a long history of egregious dishonesty, stalker behaviors, people who hang around Wiki for the sole purpose of trashing the entries for radical feminists, people who in my opinion are seriously disturbed in various ways. Some participated in the hackings of my and other feminist blogs last year. One of them used hentai rape porn on their live journal to threaten Ginmar. They will not stop. They will pile on and pile on and forevermore they will lie about what was said, they will twist what you’ve written, cull it for quotes out of context, and lie their asses off about all of it from now on. Don’t ever make the mistake of thinking any of them really wants or is capable of honest discussion. The people in that thread now who are piling on are not feminists, don’t like feminists, are anti-feminists and many of them are misogynists. Their goal is to jerk you around, play games, and waste your time bombarding you with bullshit, and they know it’s bullshit, they don’t care, they’re haters.
But that thread is exhibit A of how disingenous their “oh, the radfems refuse to engage us” is. They’ve never once been interested in any kind of discussion.
Maggie Hays // July 30, 2008 at 2:20 pm |
Woo look. A Kennerson’s responded
Good he, at least, did. However:
He also accused me of slut-shaming and wanting to enforce my “conservative” sexuality on people, and he told me I’m not really a feminst. He’s a piece of work.
He is also fond of using phrases like ‘wingnut’, ‘fascist’ etc. to describe us, in order to link us to the right wing in his readers’ minds.
He’s talking the same pile of horseshit once again. Bullshit is all he talks, in order to protect the patriarchal status quo. Sad!
I’m sorry, Nine. (((Big Hugs)))
he’s done so at a venue I refuse to visit
That’s right, Witchy. I wouldn’t visit either. I’m 100% staying away from pro-porn blogs from now on. Ignoring them is one of my strengths.
Maggie Hays // July 30, 2008 at 2:23 pm |
He sounds remarkably like a wingnut, but i shouldn’t be surprised since they have so much in common. Most notably their misogyny.
Oh, you are so right on, thebewilderness!
Nine Deuce // July 30, 2008 at 5:55 pm |
The weird part is that I wasn’t asking for men to come to my site. I was asking women who identify as sex positive why it was that they were out arguing for their right to get naked and men weren’t. That was the entire thrust of the first part of the post. And there was only one question in the whole list aimed at men. It’s funny, no? They just assumed someone was asking for their dudely opinions, as did almost everyone who came to discuss things.
CoolAunt // July 30, 2008 at 7:51 pm |
Why anyone would want to engage with these men is beyond me. Seriously, does anyone here think that their abuse of women is just talk? These men sexually abuse women and you want to speak to them? Court their attention, solicit their opinions and respond to them?
No shit. The same for the sex pox crew. Besides, that discussion or argument with them has been rehashed so many times. Talk about beating a dead horse.
Nine Deuce // July 30, 2008 at 10:44 pm |
Eh, I’m new. It wasn’t a dead horse to me yet. It is now, however.
Sis // July 31, 2008 at 12:19 am |
“…in his readers’ minds.” They would be, who?
I too sighed when I saw it come up again. This is the third go around with the same losers.
It’s their raison d’etre. They have no other purpose in life after they’ve had the arseholes bleached
Sis // July 31, 2008 at 12:33 am |
That’s possibly the one good thing about Wikipedia, is that everything done there stays there. You just have to read IACB’s “Talk” pages, and “History” pages for any porn subject, or any feminist site to see what he does, what his motivation is. It’s all there, for anyone to read what he does, step by step. He’s a prick, a real loser who exhibits sociopathic behaviour. Just one of those greasy faced, pimply creeps (well beyond pimply aged) who hangs out with other things that grow in shit.
He specifically targets feminist bio pages and subject areas on WP, and takes them down by manipulating process. He monitors for those pages and he’s on them. He writes and edits all the pornography pages. Fun to watch the change in tone there. He’s virtually slobbering, figuratively (and literally I’ll bet) jerking off.
stormy // August 2, 2008 at 12:36 pm |
Glad to see you held back on your feelings there Sis
And that bleaching comment – truly a keyboard-owing moment.